Line in Design: Types & Examples [Infographics Included]
The types of line in design (horizontal, vertical, diagonal, curved, implied) and what each communicates, with examples from art, logos and interfaces.
55 articles since 2019, newest first. Pick a topic in the bar above to narrow down.
The types of line in design (horizontal, vertical, diagonal, curved, implied) and what each communicates, with examples from art, logos and interfaces.
The law of closure: why the brain completes missing shapes. Examples from famous logos and interfaces, and how to use closure deliberately in your designs.
The law of continuation explains why the eye follows lines, curves and paths. What it is, how it differs from similarity, and how designers use it in layouts.
The law of similarity: elements that share shape, size, color or orientation are seen as related. How it differs from proximity, with examples from real interfaces.
Similarity, continuation, closure, proximity, figure-ground, symmetry and common fate, each explained with interface examples. Free cheat sheet PDF included.
The Gestalt law of symmetry explains why balanced compositions feel stable. What it is, how symmetry and asymmetry create balance, and examples from real designs.
In this article, we will discuss why the false-consensus effect is bad for UX designers and what are the ways we can avoid the effect.
In this article we will discuss how anchoring bias affects our decisions and why is it important for marketers and designers.
In this article, we are going to explore a different philosophy where we achieve aesthetic balance in our designs through imperfections: wabi-sabi.
In this article, we will discuss the bandwagon effect, how to avoid it and its effect on social media. The Bandwagon effect is a type of cognitive bias.
In this article we will discuss the types of selection bias and the ways to avoid it. Selection bias is a type of cognitive bias where...
Bias towards information that supports previous beliefs or experiences. Learn to avoid the confirmation bias for rational thinking.